Tennis Cruz
TENNIS LESSONS
TENNIS VIDEO LESSONS
SERVICE
SERVICE RETURNS
VOLLEYS
BACKHAND SLICE
FOREHAND
BACKHAND TOPSPIN
PASSING SHOTS
OVERHEAD SMASH
FOOTWORK
TENNIS BLOG
JUNIORS
TENNIS TIPS
SHOP BEST VIDEOS
TENNIS INSTRUCTION
TENNIS TRAINING
TENNIS LESSONS - Tips
COLLEGE TENNIS
TENNIS WORKOUTS
TENNIS EXERCISES
FREE TENNIS RACKET
SHOP TOP BOOKS
ATP RANKING
SHOP SOFTWARE
TENNIS HISTORY
TENNIS SCORING
TENNIS JOBS
TENNIS ARTICLES
Submit Tips/Articles
PLAYER - AGENTS
LINKS
CONTACT
ABOUT US
SUBMIT A LINK
PRIVACY
WEB DIRECTORIES
SUPPORT SITE
DISCLAIMER
Google
Login Form
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
Site Build It!
Tennis Cruz arrow TENNIS ARTICLES arrow Tennis Articles arrow Australian Open 2008 - Are we playing fair with the Draws?
Australian Open 2008 - Are we playing fair with the Draws? PDF Print E-mail
Let us take the men's draw top half as an example.  As much as I want to accept the rules, I just can't.  Of course I understand that the 1st seeded player should play the weaker players, but how weak can a whole quarter of the draw be?  Or rather how lopsided can a quarter of the draw be?


The opposition Roger Federer will have to "feather" in his quarter of the draw is just a cake walk, compared to the quarter just below him where Novack Djokovic, Dimitri Tursunov, Marata Safin, Marcos Baghdatis, Leyton Hewitt, David Nalbandian (Federers slayer twice in 2008),  Juan Carlos Ferrero, David Ferrer will be playing gargantuan matches. This list of players opposing each other in the same quarter  looks more like the list of 'who is who' that won most of the tournaments in 2007 not to mention the most Grand Slam winners together in one quarter! While Roger Federer, in his quarter of the draw, comparatively, will be  playing "no names"!!

What does this mean? The above-mentioned high calibre players, who are worthy to be finalists at the highest level of play,  will bludgeon each other to death and by the time they get to the end of their quarter and into the semi-final, whoever is left and whatever is left of them, the lucky one surviving the onslaught will be purely a shadow of himself and a sacrificial lamb for Roger Federer to give him the final coup-de-grace in style. 

This is somewhat similar to the spanish Bull-fights.  Once the poor bull is depleted of blood by the "picador",  the "matador's" pro_trackerfinal coup is kids stuff, Olé!  Nevertheless, a big song and dance is created around it and the bullfighter gets the ears, the tail and is carried by the "fans" around the arena and everyone claps!  But the question remains, was the bull fit?  Was it a fair fight? Are the players below Roger Federers quarter going to be bled to death before they face Roger?  It looks like, YES!  Is it a fair fight? NO!

What is in it for tennis fans and tennis lovers? A mockery of us and a travesty of a tournament!  As I once said this is no different then the 1930s where the previous winner was automatically put in the final. Today it is the same with a few pratice matches in between!! Now, look for yourselves, this is a copy of the Australian Open 2008 top half of the Mens' Draw at the present stage (2nd Round Top half):

ROGER FEDERERS QUARTER:

 

Roger Federer SUI (1) v Fabrice Santoro FRA

Janko Tipsarevic SRB v Fernando Verdasco ESP (25)

Juan Monaco ARG (21) v Amer Delic USA

Oscar Hernandez ESP v Tomas Berdych CZE (13)

James Blake USA (12) v Michael Russell USA

Sebastien Grosjean FRA v Robin Haase NED

Marin Cilic CRO v Jurgen Melzer AUT

Hyung-Taik Lee KOR v Fernando Gonzalez CHI (7)

 HERE STARTS THE QUARTER BELOW ROGER FEDERERS:

Novak Djokovic SRB (3) v Simone Bolelli ITA

Sam Querrey USA v Dmitry Tursunov RUS (32)

Lleyton Hewitt AUS (19) v Denis Istomin UZB

Marat Safin RUS v Marcos Baghdatis CYP (15)

David Nalbandian ARG (10) v Peter Luczak AUS

Alun Jones AUS v Juan Carlos Ferrero ESP (22)

Vincent Spadea USA v Denis Gremelmayr GER

Juan Martin Del Potro ARG v David Ferrer ESP (5)

As I said in a previous article, this is not Roger Federers fault and if there is someone I like to watch and see winning tournaments it is Roger! To end I must add that Roger has enough tennis quality and athleticism not to need these unfair advantages.  Seeing Rogers demeanour and correctness I am positive that he does not approve of what is going on!  We need to move tennis away from the 1900 hundreds into the 21st century!



In agreement with the ATP and other tennis regulatory bodies, tournaments should have the prerogative to change a player or players position in the draw to balance the overall strength of the draw itself.

Another idea that I propose, since I am critical of the system, is that it would be easy to make a draw generation computer program that would base each new tournament draw on the results of the last four tournaments played!  So if did not play in the last 4 weeks you certainly will not be seeded.

This would stimulate the players to raise their level of performonce and increase their motivation to participate in tournaments, therefore benefiting the competion itself, the sponsors and tournament organizers.

 

Your comments are welcome. 

Tennis Cruz Main Page

Google
 

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Copyright © Tenniscruz.com®. All rights reserved.




Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Furl!Yahoo!Squidoo!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!

User Comments

Please login or register to add comments

<Previous   Next>
Tennis Quiz
Site Build It!